Continuing my Lenten ruminations….
Guilt has gotten a really bad rap in our feel-good culture. Yes, there can be a truly toxic side to guilt that is not helpful at all and this has to be dealt with. But we don’t solve anything by a kind of suppression or evasion…both psychological and social. In any case, our society is mostly a guilt-denier….at both levels (something like climate change denial). If it’s not outright denial, then we embrace what I would call “cheap forgiveness”—to borrow Bonhoeffer’s notion of “cheap grace.” The Bible has a subtle and nuanced approach to this whole dilemma; in the Old Testament there is a strong emphasis on communal repentance, and in the Gospels the focus is on a personal metanoia…and a real acknowledgement that something is out of kilter. Jesus says that he has come for those who need a physician, not for those who claim they are well. More about all this later. For now, please watch this YouTube, 15-minute video. You will see a remarkable German social satirist explain what is going on in Germany….and it has critical relevance to our situation (and if you have ever studied German, at times you will laugh):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLWLb0RM7HQ
- Jan Bohmermann makes the critical distinction between individual, personal guilt and collective memory (collective guilt). Unless we are totally deluded we are somewhat aware that “something bad” happened in our “communal past,” but our personal responsibility and our relationship to this “bad” is problematic and tends to a vanishing point. This is true in Germany as Jan illustrates, and it is so true here in the U.S. For Germany it is the Nazi phenomenon, the world wars, and the Holocaust. For us it is at least slavery but also the debasement and dehumanization of Black people in the phenomenon of segregation and its concomitants. And then there is the less acknowledged history of genocide and dehumanization and despoilation of Native Americans. And more…..
- Jan delineates clearly and cleverly how even a vociferous proclamation of “past sins” (NEVER AGAIN!) can become vacuous in the absence of personal responsibility, and in fact even a substitute for a real metanoia. Instead, people engage in what Jan calls “virtue signaling.” Interesting expression….made me think of Jesus’ parable of the Pharisee and the Publican. The Pharisee in this parable is the ultimate “virtue signaler.” When the process of virtue signaling gets normalized, then we open the door to a lot of bad things…..hence the rise of the neo-Nazis in Germany.
- Back to our own U.S.A…..just think of all the consternation in recent years around movements like Black Lives Matter, around policies like DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion), and around historical analyses like Critical Race theory. Granted, all these can and do have problems and are far from perfect, but the reaction against them is so irrational, so filled with anger and venom, that we have to be worried. Is our own brand of fascism emerging? And now the people who are setting the agenda for our political and economic life seek to eradicate all traces of such voices. We need to take a step back and look at this in the larger picture, not simply as a political problem.
- Guilt comes in several forms. It depends on the kind of “world” which one perceives as “their world.” Most people live in a world mapped out by rules. Rule-breaking leads to some kind of guilt. This runs from traffic regulations all the way to the religious life. Schools have rules; states have rules; monasteries have rules; churches have rules; parents have rules, etc. All this is part of a social life aiming at a certain goal, and it does have a practical good about it. Breaking a “rule” produces some kind of guilt to one degree or another. Serious rule-breaking leads to some kind of punishment for the “guilty” party. But there is something much, much deeper about living than following rules. Sadly, however, for so many people religion, which should lead one to an awareness of this deeper level of life, is merely a matter of living up to rules. The rules can be grand rules(God’s Law) or trivial rules; it almost doesn’t matter. The religious life becomes built on a system of rewards and punishments depending on your adherence to the rules. The Pharisee kept all the rules. No guilt there! (St. Paul’s diatribe against the Law is part of the answer to this problem.) But there is a far deeper kind of guilt….one that doesn’t stem from rule-breaking but from what might be termed as a “breaking of our humanity.” A violation of who we are; getting it all wrong and surrendering ourselves to what is unreal, ultimately even misrepresenting what is ultimately Real…..basically what the Bible called “idolatry.” This can produce a profound guilt….like Peter in the Gospels breaking down after his denial of Jesus. The German people need something like that—and the American people, and….etc.
- Jan Bohmermann points out that for the far right in Germany the world wars and the Holocaust were mere “bird droppings” in their “glorious past.” So….was slavery, were the lynchings of Black people, even into the 20th century, was the unspeakable dehumanization of Black people throughout the country (Blacks and Whites were not allowed to marry as late as the 1970s in some states), was all this merely a “bird dropping” in our otherwise glorious history? Was driving Native Americans off their lands, killing them off, and eviscerating their culture, merely a “bird dropping” in our otherwise glorious past? And so much more…….
Another question: were all these merely a “rule-breaking” or were they of a very different order?
Now a common position to all this goes along the following line: This has nothing to do with me. I never owned slaves; my ancestors never owned slaves; I never discriminated against anybody….etc., etc. There is a real problem with this kind of vision that doesn’t reveal its full negative impact because it sounds so reasonable….like a spiritual iceberg that is mostly under water…. Let me illustrate: I love to go camping in Yosemite’s high country….the remote trails, the silence, solitude, and beauty of the wilderness. But I am enjoying myself in a place that was once home to a small tribe of people. Do I recall that they were either killed or driven out of there by the new arrivals during the California gold rush era? By the time the area was designated a national park it was a “pristine wilderness.” It’s more than foolish to not acknowledge this and the fact that wherever our two feet stand is land that has soaked in the blood of those who had called it home for eons. So now….when I arrive there I put up my tent and my Tibetan prayer flags and pray with the wind for all concerned.
I grew up in a lower middle-class neighborhood on the South Side of Chicago in the 1950s. Mostly blue collar workers, hard working, church-going, caring for their families, all kinds of ethnic groups…..but all white…..Black folk were not welcome to say the least. Did anyone recognize how much of the country’s economic foundations were laid by the sweat and blood of Black workers, willing and unwilling….and so many other “undesirables”? And how much the white community benefitted from that labor?
This now reminds me of something I wrote here over 10 years ago when I was starting this blog. I wrote about an economics college professor who held up a cup of coffee and asked his class, “What do you see?” And of course no one saw what he was really pointing at, so he began, “Do you see the man who took care of the plants that produced the beans for this coffee? Do you see the person who picked the beans in the hot sun? Do you see the laborer who packed the grounds in a container?” ( My mother did that in Chicago for $1.50 an hour.) He concluded, “Try to see that when you have that cup of coffee.” An econ lesson but also something much, much more…whether he intended that or not! And then I added an old Sufi saying: When a thief looks at a holy man, all he sees are pockets. Indeed, we see only what our hearts are open to seeing. And it seems now we are not able to see our deep authentic guilt.
Mostly we all live at the level of “rule-breaking” guilt; asleep, numb, blind to what we are really participating in, to what we are part of. The culture of individualism, which is built on navigating the rules to one’s own advantage, has had some benefits but it has become a spiritual and social cancer now. Everyone is infected: “what’s in it for me?” Climate-change denial is rooted in this narrow myopic vision of self. What is concealed by this culture and by the “narrow self” is the actual interconnected nature of all being. Religiosity that fails to recognize this will go awry and actually do a lot of harm (The Jesuits owned slaves and benefitted financially from this in early Maryland). All the major traditions deal with this problem in their own way. Christianity has its own language and its own vision of what this reality means; Buddhism has its own. I like the simplicity and directness of Thich Nhat Hanh: “Interbeing is the understanding that nothing exists separately from anything else. We are all interconnected. By taking care of another person, you take care of yourself. By taking care of yourself, you take care of the other person. Happiness and safety are not individual matters. If you suffer, I suffer. If you are not safe, I am not safe. There is no way for me to be truly happy if you are suffering. If you can smile, I can smile too. The understanding of interbeing is very important. It helps us to remove the illusion of loneliness, and transform the anger that comes from the feeling of separation.”
Now this has enormous implications for our reflection. Real, authentic, deep guilt is actually an opening and an invitation to discover and recognize that deep connectedness in which we live and act. Whether our recognition is merely a flicker of a vision or an actual explosion of awareness like Saul of Tarsus blinded, thrown off his horse and entering into a revolutionary upheaval of his identity, we no longer live by rules but by our active participation in this interbeing. And furthermore this radically transforms our grasp of notions like sin, guilt, forgiveness, etc. Indeed, especially our relationship to the “sin” of our brothers and sisters, and, yes, even to all “strangers,” past and present.
- We need to learn how to read the language of authentic traditional Christian spirituality because all this is present there but perhaps in a way we no longer can translate it into our own awareness. Sometimes we need help because the language seems stale, cliched, exaggerated rhetoric, impossible, or just plain weird. But one should listen with the heart.
Consider the traditional mantra of the Hesychast tradition, the Jesus Prayer: Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.
Each phrase, each word holds a richness of significance and meaning, but here I will focus on only one word, “sinner.” The root meaning of “sin” is “to miss the mark” like in off target, or it can be taken as “separation.” Now if you look at any dictionary or catechism you will see reference to “breaking God’s law.” This is ok if you understand what is being said, but fundamentally sin is not rule-breaking in the same sense as we normally use that term. However that old language can too easily be taken in that direction and most often that is all that is seen. The real sin is when we fail to acknowledge in our lives that community of being in which we live. If you listen to St. Paul carefully, you will see how that works.
Let us conclude: Here I will refer to my own “spiritual father” of sorts, Dostoyevsky’s Father Zossima (I first met him when I was 17 and he has been my guide since!). What he teaches sounds like what I call “impossible Christianity”…..within the context of our sensible, rational, social existence it all seems like an unreal, impossible ideal (like the Sermon on the Mount). But if you listen to his words with your heart, I think you will hear what you need to hear:
“Brothers, have no fear of men’s sin. Love a man even in his sin, for that is the semblance of Divine Love and is the highest love on earth. Love all God’s creation, the whole and every grain of sand in it. Love every leaf, every ray of God’s light. Love the animals, love the plants, love everything. If you love everything, you will perceive the divine mystery in things. Once you perceive it, you will begin to comprehend it better every day. And you will come at last to love the whole world with an all-embracing love. Love the animals: God has given them the rudiments of thought and joy untroubled. Do not trouble it, don’t harass them, don’t deprive them of their happiness, don’t work against God’s intent. Man, do not pride yourself on superiority to the animals; they are without sin, and you, with your greatness, defile the earth by your appearance on it, and leave the traces of your foulness after you—alas, it is true of almost every one of us! Love children especially, for they too are sinless like the angels; they live to soften and purify our hearts and as it were to guide us. Woe to him who offends a child! Father Anfim taught me to love children. The kind, silent man used often on our wanderings to spend the farthings given us on sweets and cakes for the children. He could not pass by a child without emotion. That’s the nature of the man.
At some thoughts one stands perplexed, especially at the sight of men’s sin, and wonders whether one should use force or humble love. Always decide to use humble love. If you resolve on that once for all, you may subdue the whole world. Loving humility is marvelously strong, the strongest of all things, and there is nothing else like it.
Every day and every hour, every minute, walk round yourself and watch yourself, and see that your image is a seemly one. You pass by a little child, you pass by, spiteful, with ugly words, with wrathful heart; you may not have noticed the child, but he has seen you, and your image, unseemly and ignoble, may remain in his defenseless heart. You don’t know it, but you may have sown an evil seed in him and it may grow, and all because you were not careful before the child, because you did not foster in yourself a careful, actively benevolent love. Brothers, love is a teacher; but one must know how to acquire it, for it is hard to acquire, it is dearly bought, it is won slowly by long labor. For we must love not only occasionally, for a moment, but forever. Everyone can love occasionally, even the wicked can.
My brother asked the birds to forgive him; that sounds senseless, but it is right; for all is like an ocean, all is flowing and blending; a touch in one place sets up movement at the other end of the earth. It may be senseless to beg forgiveness of the birds, but birds would be happier at your side—a little happier, anyway—and children and all animals, if you were nobler than you are now. It’s all like an ocean, I tell you. Then you would pray to the birds too, consumed by an all-embracing love, in a sort of transport, and pray that they too will forgive you your sin. Treasure this ecstasy, however senseless it may seem to men.
My friends, pray to God for gladness. Be glad as children, as the birds of heaven. And let not the sin of men confound you in your doings. Fear not that it will wear away your work and hinder its being accomplished. Do not say, ‘Sin is mighty, wickedness is mighty, evil environment is mighty, and we are lonely and helpless, and evil environment is wearing us away and hindering our good work from being done.’ Fly from that dejection, children! There is only one means of salvation, then take yourself and make yourself responsible for all men’s sins, that is the truth, you know, friends, for as soon as you sincerely make yourself responsible for everything and for all men, you will see at once that it is really so, and that you are to blame for everyone and for all things.”
”Love one another, Fathers,’ said Father Zossima, as far as Alyosha could remember afterwards. ‘Love God’s people. Because we have come here and shut ourselves within these walls, we are no holier than those that are outside, but on the contrary, from the very fact of coming here, each of us has confessed to himself that he is worse than others, than all men on earth….
And the longer the monk lives in his seclusion, the more keenly he must recognize that. Else he would have had no reason to come here. When he realizes that he is not only worse than others, but that he is responsible to all men for all and everything, for all human sins, national and individual, only then the aim of our seclusion is attained. For know, dear ones, that every one of us is undoubtedly responsible for all men — and everything
on earth, not merely through the general sinfulness of creation, but each one personally for all mankind and
every individual man. This knowledge is the crown of life for the monk and for every man. For monks are not a special sort of men, but only what all men ought to be. Only through that knowledge, our heart grows soft with infinite, universal, inexhaustible love. Then every one of you will have the power to win over the whole world by love and to wash away the sins of the world with your tears….
Each of you keep watch over your heart and confess your sins to yourself unceasingly. Be not afraid of your sins, even when perceiving them, if only there be penitence, but make no conditions with God. Again, I say, be not proud. Be proud neither to the little nor to the great. Hate not those who reject you, who insult you, who abuse and slander you. Hate not the atheists, the teachers of evil, the materialists — and I mean not only the good ones — for there are many good ones among them, especially in our day — hate not even the wicked ones. Remember them in your prayers thus: Save, O Lord, all those who have none to pray for them, save too all those who will not pray. And add: it is not in pride that I make this prayer, O Lord, for I am lower than all men….”